Talk:Harmony (color)

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2015-10-18. The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.

SIGGRAPH Proceedings reference

The ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2006) reference I just added came from this site. Someone with access to the journal may wish to check it. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 18, 2015 rewrite

On October 18, 2015, the contents were replaced with the content of Color theory#Color harmony

For attribution purposes, here is the edit history of Color theory as of a few minutes ago:

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 06:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need hundreds of Kb of cut'n'pasted edit history, which makes the page slow to load and difficult to edit, so I've removed it. A link suffices. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Here's the link to the edit right before yours, which has all of that history in it. My concern was if the copied-from page were ever deleted, the history would "disappear" (for non-admins at least) right along with it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible categories

I found two categories that might be relevant but I'm not enough of an expert on this topic or the two categories to be 100% confident this article belongs to either of them:

Category:Visual arts theory

and one of its parent categories,

Category:Aesthetics

so I'm just throwing these out there in hopes a more informed person will either add them or reply here and say "no, not really relevant." davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]