Jump to content

Talk:Harmless

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This is the best hard redirect on Wikipedia, bar none.

Disambiguation

[edit]

Wikipedia is not a compendium of in-jokes.

Ziusudra 19:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Harmlessness which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 December 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is no consensus to move this at this time. Best, (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


HarmlessHarmless (disambiguation) – Move to redirect this title to Harm, as "Harmless" is merely absent harm, and is therefore defined by harm. BD2412 T 14:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I'm not sure that this disambiguation page needs to exist at all, given that not one of the articles linked here is for something named "Harmless". See WP:PTM. 162 etc. (talk) 18:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • WikiNav doesn't render for this, there's too little traffic: 43 searches and 11 empty referers in August, 35 and 14 in September, 27 and 11 in October plus 12 internal. Harm is already the first link in the article, though. Do we think the readers are missing it somehow? Redirecting this sounds like a bit of a WP:NOTDICT situation. --Joy (talk) 09:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose If someone is searching for "harmless", they obviously do not want "harm" and it would be patronizing to redirect people there. The exception is if the disambiguation page is entirely unmerited, which may be the case, in which case I still oppose. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 19:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I'm honestly not sure what the (small handful of) people who search for "harmless" are looking for, but I'm not convinced they're more likely to find it at Harm than on the dab page. I suspect the link to Wiktionary is more useful than anything else we can provide. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.