Talk:Harleian Collection

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

London Low‑importance

	London portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Library Top‑importance

	This redirect is related to the British Library. Please copy assessments of the article from the most relevant WikiProject template to this one as needed.British LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/British LibraryTemplate:WikiProject British LibraryBritish Library-related articles
Top	This redirect has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Article name

I am surprised that this article should be entitled the "Harley Collection", rather than the "Harleian collection". I appreciate that Harleian is an antique adjectival form. However, that is what the collection is still called by the British library, as should be apparent from the name of the external links. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the move. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether there's been a change in policy in the last two or three of years, but the BL website now appears to refer throughout to the "Harley collection" and "Harley manuscripts". Moreover, when I recently tried to order a MS as "Harleian MS 1234" the online system didn't recognise the reference, which I had to re-enter (successfully) as "Harley MS 1234". Does anyone know any more about this? On the evidence to hand, I think the article title should probably revert to "Harley Collection". GrindtXX (talk) 00:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. It sucks. I appreciate that Harleian is the superior (not "antique") adjectival form but, if the thing has changed its name, it's time to change ours.

Also worth looking into: is the COMMON name really the "Harley Collection"? The Latin name is certainly "library" and seems to be a semi-official designation as well. —

Llywelyn II

13:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Llywelyn. The proper name should be "Harleian Library", the correct translation of Bibliotheca Harleiana, regardless of what the trendy modernisers of the BL want to call it now. It formed the Library of Robert Harley, and is still largely intact, just now on different shelves. Some readers may get confused into thinking a library is just a building, hence probably the BL's use of the term "collection", whilst in fact it also means "a collection of books". Many uses of such terminology survive, e.g. see the British Museum website:[1] "The King's Library was a royal collection of books created by King George III and donated to the nation...". This article is not only about the collection of books today, but also about the library as it existed in Harley's time. Page move to "Harleian Library".(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 18:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]