Jump to content

Talk:Hardanger Line/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Article is well written and complies to WP:MOS.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All references are in order.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Article is broad in its coverage and remains focused.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Article complies to WP:NPOV.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Article is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All images comply to fair use requirements and are properly captioned.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments: There were some minor issues, which I have fixed. I am satisfied that the article complies with all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it. -- S Masters (talk) 11:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time and effort to review the article. Arsenikk (talk) 11:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]