Talk:Harbor Island, San Diego

Name of article should be changed

The name of this article should actually be "Harbor Island, San Diego, California" in keeping with all other articles about neighborhoods in San Diego. --MelanieN (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: boldy closing and moving discussion here as this affects many, many articles. I'll inform everyone that has commented so far. Dpmuk (talk) 15:14, 23 September 2009 (UTC) ~~~~[reply]

Harbor Island, San Diego → Harbor Island, San Diego, California — All other articles about neighborhoods in San Diego follow this format, such as "La Jolla, San Diego, California" and "Point Loma, San Diego, California" MelanieN (talk) 14:17, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Move the others, as unnecessary disambiguation (unless there is another Point Loma in a different San Diego, which I seriously doubt). Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then you would be re-naming about 90 neighborhoods that are named according to the pattern "XXX, San Diego, California." See the category "Neighborhoods in San Diego, California". --MelanieN (talk) 20:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]

Yes. I don't see why these cumbersome titles were adopted in the first place; what good do they do to the encyclopedia? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 00:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Favor. Routine change in keeping with the naming of nearby localities. Student7 (talk) 22:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other California cities for comparison: see category "Neighborhoods in San Francisco, California" and category "Neighborhoods in Los Angeles, California". --MelanieN (talk) 23:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.