A fact from Harald zur Hausen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 October 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,442 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of University of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
I have just modified 4 external links on Harald zur Hausen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
For some reason there are TWO sections for Awards and the controversy surrounding zur Hausen’s Nobel prize award is repeated nearly word for word in both places. I’m too much of a newbie editor here to want to tackle streamlining this into a single section, but it looks pretty odd and clearly needs fixing. Thanks for your attention. Wistfulwitness (talk) 21:35, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Request to remove data about Ethel-Michele de Villiers
I have removed the following statement from the article,
Zur Hausen has three sons from his first marriage. In 1993, he married his second wife, Professor Ethel-Michele de Villiers, who at the time was a fellow researcher at the German Cancer Research Center. He currently lives with his wife in Wald-Michelbach, Hesse, as it is unsourced, and per a request from an ip claiming to be Ethel-Michele de Villiers (see Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#All data in Wikipedia on Ethel-Michele de Villiers). As this is a BLP article, I felt it was to better remove the statement and sort out on this page whether it belongs in the article. - Donald Albury16:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I copied rather than cut the content in question in the article page. Since Fram has pointed out a reliable source here, I'll let things stand as they are, and ask what the consensus is for letting the content stay in the article. Donald Albury18:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have revised the content, now in Personal life section, and added two references. The fact that de Villiers was a long-time collaborator on the papilloma virus and cervical cancer topic, thanked specifically at the end of the Nobel Prize biography, makes her in my opinion relevant and worth keeping despite the request from the IP claiming to be de Villiers. David notMD (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
