Talk:Haplogroup B-M60

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human Genetic History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human Genetic HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryHuman Genetic History articles

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

MAP

I have a problem with that map. First, it shows Egypt as somehow genetically the same as Arabia and the Middle East. This certainly is not true for haplogroup E1b1b and Southern Egypt. [1] MrSativa (talk) 13:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drawing Egypt is a bit difficult because the frequency of E is almost similar to that of the descendants of F (FT). In general F is more important in the south and Sudan, while in the desert to the west E is greater. I corrected Tunisia and Algeria, where E is greater. In general, in towns where the ancient substrate is Berber or Tuareg, E predominates, and if it is Coptic or Arabic, F.--Maulucioni (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Haplogroup B-M60. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060320202502/https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/atlas.html?card=my027 to https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/atlas.html?card=my027

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A BAD MAP !!!

I agree that map is bad - there is NO PLACE FOR R1b haplogroup! Does anbody want to push R1b among oldest group? Hide the Truth on ancienty? Search for Vatican's agents - they like very much to hide the Truth on our origins and manipulate our knowledge! PLEASE CATCH THEM - STOP THEM! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.226.252.143 (talk) 11:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thousands of years ago, an ancient branch of R1b called V88, different from the European one, reached Central Africa from the Nile region. In the same way that African branches of A (A1a) and E (E1b1b) reached Europe a thousand years ago.--Maulucioni (talk) 23:54, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]