Talk:Hanumangarh

India: Cities / Rajasthan Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Main Cities In Hanumangarh Distric

== 'Rawatsar Nohar Bhadra Pilibangan Tibbi Sangria' ==

Headline text

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 07:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PRAMOD SWAMI

(removed likely non free file - Off2riorob (talk) 19:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC))PRAMOD SWAMI --117.96.98.137 (talk) 09:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)~~PRAMOD SWAMI~~[reply]

Village's in hanumangarh thsil

Gangagarh,srinagar,fathegarh,karnisar,shazipura,ramsara,kishanpura,munda,khola,gurusar,jhambar,jawalewala.satipura,garhu,budsinghwala,roranwali, dholipal,jorkian,chistiyan,hiranwali,jandanwali,paccasarana,dablirathan,makkasar,etc

This article is 80% wrong and false.

In wikipedia we have two articles 1.Hanumangarh 2.Hanumangarh district. This article is about Hanumangarh city and in this article unneccessary facts,information regarding District has been added,which make this article direction less such as villages/fairs etc.plz wikipedians grant me permission to clean this material and replace to Hanumangarh District article.(Sivender) Shemaroo (talk) 10:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC) I sivender(User:Shemaroo) has deleted non related material from this article.I have displaced that material to Article Hanumangarh district where it should be. Shemaroo (talk) 02:55, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

about the fairs and the historic value of the district.

Hi,

  i want to say that this district has a lot of historic treasure in its chest.The KaliBanga which is link to human race's important past golden era's. Palu village which is eyewitness of the known war of 15 century. the pics of human bones are spread all over the field.After that it has museum which holds letter of Swami Vivekananda.And have fort of Bhatner.
   About fairs their is well known horse fair in that all over four states farmers come to participate.Nath sampradya belongs to gogamadi which belongs to Veer Gogaji.It helds fair every year and approximate 1 Million people pray their wishes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.193.126 (talk) 11:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Same Pages, need to merge or remove one page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanumangarh_district — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yourstudystyle (talk • contribs) 05:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hanumangarh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120701185609/http://hanumangarh.nic.in/places_of_interest.htm to http://hanumangarh.nic.in/places_of_interest.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]