Jump to content

Talk:Hans Karl von Winterfeldt/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 05:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lead and infobox;
    • He negotiated the Convention of Westminster and received the Order of the Black Eagle and the Order Pour le Mérite; did he receive the honours for the negotiations? Please make it clear fixed
    • Please check the "Allegiance" parameter in infobox. The country's name is missing. fixed
    • I am sure you're well aware that "Service/branch" is for "Army, navy or the air force" Frederick moved him around as needed
    • General of Infantry; any link or modern equivalent done
    • No need of references in the infobox, because they reflect the prose ok
  • Section 1;
    • lord of several estates; by birth? not clear, removed
    • His education was imperfect; any specific reason? none given
  • Section 2;
    • Major-General; remove hyphen and also link done
    • modern equivalent for "cornet", I think it is sub-lieutenant it is in the British Army, but in the German armies, the ranks are different. I could link to Fahnrich, but that isn't right either.
    • Link grand-duchess, maid-of-honor, Count and major done
    • Frederick William is over linked done
More later ... Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Section 2.1;
    • battle of Mollwitz; initial capitals done
    • defeated the Austrians (17 May 1741) -> defeated the Austrians on 17 May 1741 done
    • One month from this day -> A month later done
    • second war; mention in full done
    • promoted him (1745) major-general, to date from January 1743 -> was promoted to major general in 1745, with effect from January 1743 done
  • Section 3;
    • Development of military intelligence program; I think the title isn't apt, because nothing much about the program is mentioned. Better name it "Later years" it's really 7 years war....I've reworked it
    • put quotes on the saying of the king, perhaps {{quote}} would be the best option I couldn't get it to work right, simplified (took out the German)
    • any reason for transfer of the grave? none given probably Frederick William IV wanted to create grand monuments.
  • What are the copyright statuses of the designs of the memorials? GDFL etc free use posted by users
  • Do any of the references have ISBNs? 2 do, added
  • 0% confidence, violation unlikely.
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]