Talk:Hans Henning Atrott

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Lithuania Low‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

THE GERMAN EVALUATION

I do not mind putting the text of the controversy to the archive. In only object that within a dispute the one party "evaluates" the conflict to the very favor of itself. For example, it is an unbiased and useful information that the Germans - already for more than a decade wanting to bring the English version of this article in a strict line with their defamatory one in their edition - are also strongly contested in their country. This is about a fact! In addition, it is no insult to inform the readers whether the one that cannot be wrong is a PhD or a cigarettes seller. This is also no insult but a fact that can be verified. Everybody has to prove its competence. Schinkelburg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schinkelburg (talk • contribs) 07:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

THE BOSSY GERMANS

Hans Atrott rightly claims having become a "German" by "accident" since without the Germans' annexation of Lithuania Minor in 1938 he wouldn't be one. By the way, the Germans did not acknowledge people from this part of Lithuanian as German citizens, after WWII (from 1945 until 1950). Here, this sort of individuals (as "co-workers of German Wikipedia") want to cover the anyway never ending shame of their country that a contemporary famous one exiled from their country. The average German is used to imposing his will on others. He fools himself being the biggest, strongest, smartest and best. It is not the problem, whether the Germans are still Nazis, today, but that the Nazis were genuine Germans...! The German screwballs rather should be banned from conquering "the world." A reader from Poland 5.172.188.58 (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hans Henning Atrott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170118150541/http://store.americastarbooks.pub/9781683941484 to http://store.americastarbooks.pub/9781683941484

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]