Talk:Hans Baluschek

A fact from Hans Baluschek appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 July 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Nazis called the paintings of Hans Baluschek (example pictured) "degenerate art"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hans Baluschek.

Wikipedia

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Germany

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article was translated from German Wikipedia. Sca (talk)

Image layout

Hafspajen and Sca, please stop and talk about the layout. I note that nobody has removed the big picture of the arriving train - the disagreement there seems to be about where to position it. I've removed the indentation because it causes the image to bump half the references to the far right in a most peculiar way. Whether the image should go on the left or the right, there or higher - please discuss. The other issue is the bottom gallery. I agree, it's desirable to have the images be large enough to see. But I'm not sure you are keeping in mind that the number on a row is going to vary depending on the reader's monitor dimensions or how wide they have the window set to be. If you are using a large monitor, try moving the border of the window and you will see the images rearrange themselves into a different number of rows. You may well be seeing quite different versions of the article from each other. Please talk this through. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yngvadottir, see Sca's talk. I tried to talk about edit war, with the third revert. Hafspajen (talk) 20:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've now looked there, and it's pretty clear you are seeing different layouts. Each of you has seen the other's version creating one picture hanging alone under the others in the gallery. Please talk about it and figure out how to get the gallery to work acceptably for both of you. On the placement of the train - you two need to talk about it, I don't know the reasoning behind putting it on the left, but indented. I'll now bow out. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yngvadottir, I'm not going to discuss this with Herr Hafspajen any more; he's not amenable to anything I say and insists on his way or the highway. Suddenly this week he changed his longstanding genial attitude toward me — after a whole year of fruitful collaboration. Let him do what he wants. Sca (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I moved the train to right. You of course are welcome to make any changes you deem appropriate. Sca (talk) 21:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NO - YOU did. You changed YOUR ways. Read just User talk:Hafspajen#Hilfe bitte! Oh, than I was good to have. Only TWO DAYS AGO!! But now ... edit war! And it was MY work the layout, it was my work that blasted Winter article - and I don't usually go editwarring with people who are nice to me. ACTUALLY NEVER EVER DID: No, if somebody from outside is not getting into this - explaing that it is not OK editwarring - I AM NOT interested. I am not here to help people just for getting kicked in the as as a thank you for being nice. just read this now deleted exchange. Help me please.. and two days after behaving like this.... I had enough problems in my private life and a whole lot other things.

AND -

1) you should discuss and not revert - that is elementary.

+

2) you should try to act civilized

) it is NOT OK to revert 4 times in 24 hours.

I am tired of Wikipedia, I am seriously thinking of stopping editing soon. Maybe in a short while.

This is not fun, people getting crazy like this. Yngvadottir or Crisco 1492 - tell him what edit war and three revert rule is. Hafspajen (talk) 23:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in big bold letters on my talk page, do what you want with Baluschek. I won't make any more changes. Let's just drop it. It's a dead horse. Sca (talk) 00:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]