Talk:Hanna Rosin

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish Women Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

keep

I'm voting for a keep. There's no way to prove she wrote it herself. It's definitely suspicious, but there's no way to counter a claim that Plotz wrote it and that it's therefore totally legit. They're a married couple, so that IP would have been the same either way. Everyone should just chill Mardiste (talk) 23:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Huh? Is this apropos of anything at all? --CAVincent (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a propos of the allegation that she wrote her own Wikipedia entry. Mardiste (talk) 20:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She most likely did, since this article is obviously sanitized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.131.153.242 (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

college?

I can find no record of HR attending college. Is it possible that she is not a college graduate? Hedgehogfox (talk) 18:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stanford University. Answered my own question. Hedgehogfox (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Folks,

I knew Hanna well in high school and have followed her career. All of this is accurate. She was in fact, with her partner David Coleman (at Stuyvesant High School), by far the best debate "duo" in the United States in 1986 and 1987. She and David were the only team that my partner and I never managed to beat. Hanna went to Stanford, for sure. David, also my friend, went to Yale. Then Hanna went to work for The New Republic...after that I lost track. But the early stuff is definitely true.

Devin Hosea devin@alumni.princeton.edu bio: http://www.linkedin.com/in/devinhosea

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Devinhosea (talk • contribs) 05:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sales figures? Failure?

The use of book sales figures from Nielsen Book Scan here is problematic, and raises both NPOV and WP policy on living persons ("Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone."). It's impossible to say from raw sales figures whether a book was a "success" or not; a book may garner good reviews, but not sell as well as expected, and the proportion of sales to expected sales, or advances, would be important too. Unless some outside, impartial reliable source, such as Publisher's Weekly, says the sales were poor or disappointing, I think this article should not opine on the matter -- don't think the figures themselves should be used but would like more input on that issue from others. Clevelander96 (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hanna Rosin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071106071940/http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2005/11/11/news/13760.shtml to http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2005/11/11/news/13760.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]