Talk:Hanna Kvanmo

Women's History C‑class Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

POV neutralization

I removed and/or tagged as "{ {fact}}"some of the worst POV terminology, such as positive buzzwords and claims of popularity (her party had popular support of 2-3% of population, a claim that she was "one of the most popular politicians in Norway" should have good references.

Also, "I think it stood in Dagbladet in somewhere in 1985" is not a source. Dagbladet is a tabloid newspaper, so it should be possible to check that

It was an actual poll, and not Dagbladet asking people to call in and tell what they think, allowing 100 people to call in, and call it a statistic.
It actually stood in the paper.

With that, I hope we can start thinking about removing the POV tag.

Heptor _talk 18:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you have been a bit too rigorous in your pruning of the article. I would like to see the bit about her colorful personality and the remark about "filling up the Storting" put back into i. We don't have to get all too sterile, and it is undisputed among people who lived in Norway when she was an active politician that she had that vivacious, "straight from the liver" quality about her. __meco 19:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be good to have the thing about "filling up the Storting" in the article, yes. The problem is with the sources - wikipedia requires this statement to be refere in a credible source, for example somebody (credible) confirming that she said that in a newspaper. Otherwise, how can we be sure she actually said that? -- Heptor _talk 11:56, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes to verifiability such stringent procedure as you invoke is confined to matters with "blp" concerns. In the case of this claimed quote, adding an in-text {{cn}}/{{fact}} would suffice, without removing the quote itself (at least not until a considerable time period has lapsed without someone coming up with the required citation). Unless of course you have probable suspicion that the quote is false. __meco 19:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you are right. I putting the quote back in with { {cn}}. -- Heptor _talk 10:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How old was she when she served on the Eastern Front?

I have no "axe" to grind here, but if she was born in June 1926 she would have been only 18 when the war ended. How old was she when she volunteered (?) for Red Cross service, and how long was she actually in the East?

Her most internationally controversial remark

Her remarks attacking Rabin only, in 2002 (with respect to the 1994 peace prize), created disgust and revulsion among numerous individuals in the United States and elsewhere, and directly led to the "revoke Arafat's prize" movement as a spontaneous response (not to mention that it caused many to question why a convicted Nazi collaborator was ever appointed to the Nobel peace prize committee in the first place). AnonMoos (talk) 10:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hanna Kvanmo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110523164628/http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1066551.ece to http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1066551.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]