Talk:Hanhart syndrome/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Argenti Aertheri (talk · contribs) 21:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

GA review

Last updated at 2023-08-23 00:00:54 by Argenti Aertheri

See what the criteria are and what they are not

1) Well-written

1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

2) Verifiable with no original research

2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

2c) it contains no original research

2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism

3) Broad in its coverage

3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

4) Neutral:

4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

5) Stable:

5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Overall:

Comments:

@Etriusus: I could probably pass this as-is, but I'd prefer if you could fix these first:

• "Diagnosis of Hanhart syndrome previously used CVS during the early stages of pregnancy, first 10 weeks of amenorrhoea." - the bit after the comma needs to be connected to the sentence before it (perhaps "which is the first 10 weeks..."?)

 Done

• "Diagnosis of Hanhart syndrome previously used CVS during the early stages of pregnancy, first 10 weeks of amenorrhoea. This would be able to test for vascular disruption during fetal development. This testing method has since been abandoned due a correlation between CVS early in a pregnancy and oromandibular limb dysgenesis, leading to a decrease in prenatal diagnoses." - this all needs medical citation

 Done Removed and cleaned up, I misread the source

• "and the survival rate for affected individuals is approximately 30%." - this needs a better source, preferably a medical one

 Done, I was unable to find a better source, removed.

• You might want to change the caption on the first image. This is the caption on commons: "Subtotal absence of the phalanges (preservation of the hypoplastic thumbs and hypoplastic 5th fingers, respectively) in a patient with oromandibular-limb hypogenesis syndrome. Also note the esotropia, due to bilateral sixth nerve palsies." The facial palsy seems like the least relevant symptom.

 Done

• There are a couple times in the lead where you use "disease" where you probably mean "disorder"

 Done

@Argenti Aertheri:, back to you. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 21:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Looks good @Etrius:!

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.