Talk:Hangenberg event

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hangenberg event article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Hangenberg event is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Name

What's the origin of the name? --Qyd (talk) 15:31, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's named from the Hangenberg Shale, part of a sequence that straddles the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary, from the Rhenish Mountains in Germany. I should probably add that. Mikenorton (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to look it up in the literature, and I think I identified the exact location. The Hangenberg seems to be a small mountain close to Deinstrop (incorporated into Arnsberg) in Westphalia. The mountain isn't in any online maps, but in this document it is described as being opposite of Calcit Edelsplitt Produktions GmbH on the other site of the K 26 road close to a small lake and a small forested area. That's here. The Hangenberg geological site is on the southern end of this small mountain according to sources. --::Slomox:: >< 09:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

it seems, that Reference 1 disappeared. I always get an "page not found-Error". Is it possible to recover this Source? I really would like to read a little bit in this pdf-file. thanks in advice -- Hartmann Schedel ^cheers 13:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it took so long, it only just occurred to me to try the Wayback machine and I found a copy third try. Mikenorton (talk) 12:45, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much Mikenorton - this time it works - no problem that it need so long - it is long time ago :-)-- Hartmann Schedel ^cheers 07:57, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hangenberg event. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090718045031/http://www.paleoweb.net/kaiser/Kaiser_et_al_2006_palaeo3.pdf to http://www.paleoweb.net/kaiser/Kaiser_et_al_2006_palaeo3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]