Talk:Hammond Gateway station

Indiana Low‑importance

Hammond Gateway station is within the scope of WikiProject Indiana, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for, and sustain comprehensive coverage of the U.S. state of Indiana and related subjects on Wikipedia.

IndianaWikipedia:WikiProject IndianaTemplate:WikiProject IndianaIndiana articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can do:
WikiProject Indiana alerts Requested Reassessments Indiana articles needing assessed Indiana cleanup listing Articles needing infoboxes Articles needing attention To-do Lists Articles needing images

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge, since there hasn't been a response for days and consensus is in favor of the merger. AlphaBeta135 talk 22:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest merging Hammond station (South Shore Line) to Hammond Gateway station#History as they are short articles about a South Shore Line station in Hammond, with the latter being the newly-opened replacement station of the former. Also, the name "Hammond station (South Shore Line)" is a little bit ambiguous considering that the Hammond Gateway is also a station in Hammond that is served by the South Shore Line. AlphaBeta135 talk 02:04, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. I'd argue that having it be one singular article would make sense due to the very close proximity of the two stations, to the point it could be argued that it's just a reconstructed version of the previous station, just slightly relocated. There are also a few other notable cases, like with NAIT/Blatchford Market station in Edmonton, Calgary, as well as Old City Hall station in Tacoma, Washington, among others. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 09:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support given the physical proximity. Mackensen (talk) 12:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support A combined article will provide a more coherent history than two separate articles. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.