Talk:Hallucinate (song)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 06:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

I will review this soon.The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

1. Well written:
   1. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;
   2. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
   1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
   2. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;

• I have heard Celebmix is unreliable. If I'm wrong, please let me know.

• I don't think it has ever been classified as unreliable, it's just been challenged as so. I'll remove it just in case. LOVI33 23:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

• Wikilink Billboard to Billboard for ref 1.
• Remove wikilink for Billboard on ref 13 and ref 37.
• MOS:CAPS for ref 64.

•  Not done per Template:single chart

• Is ref 83 reliable?

• I don't see why not. LOVI33 23:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

• MOS:CAPS for ref 88.
• Wikilink NME on ref 86 and remove the wikilink for NME on ref 110.
• MOS:CAPS for ref 88.
• Remove wikilink for The Face on ref 108.

 Done

1. 1. it contains no original research; and
   2. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
2. Broad in its coverage:
   1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

• with the latter of the three" → "with all three"

•  Not done, referring to last person mentioned, not all of them. LOVI33 23:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

• "It runs for 3 minutes and 28 seconds," → It runs for a total of 3 minutes and 28 seconds,"
• italisice Insider
• italisice Complex

 Done

1. 1. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
2. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
3. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
4. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
   1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
   2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
5. Overall
   1. 

The Ultimate Boss, thanks for the review! I have addressed all your comments. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do. LOVI33 23:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

LOVI33 I will pass this! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 07:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.