Talk:Hallstein Doctrine

Untitled

how did the Hallstein Doctrine "effectively tried to impose retroactive conditions on the unconditional surrender of 1945." ?? someone has to explain this to me, otherwise I propose that this sentence is reworded (Patrick 23:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Merge proposal

This article should deal only with Germany. It is proposed that the section Similar situations be merged into the article Exclusive Mandate, which is about the general concept. That article already contains most of the information, is listed here under See also and refers to the main articles. The section here should read something like: "Similar exclusive mandate policies (One-China policy) were pursued by the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China, and the situation in Vietnam during the Vietnam war was somewhat similar." --Boson (talk) 01:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i guess it would be best if there is Exclusive Mandate as a gerneral article and atricles like Hallstein Doctrine or One-China policy for the specific examples....13:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.172.96.95 (talk)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hallstein Doctrine/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The Hallstein Doctrine was a major element of German foreign policy for many years.
Does this merit importance=mid?
See also Walter Hallstein.Done.--Boson 10:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 10:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 17:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)