This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Yes, it's part of many Iranian names during the Qajar era. The Cambridge History of Iran calls him 'Hajji Mohammad Hossein Isfahani/Khan', hence why I moved the name of the article, which you randomly moved back. If I'm not mistaken, 'hajji' was like 'sir' back then in Iran. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:50, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Would more say that it was part of his name than a honorific title. Academic sources such as Iranica and Cambridge History of Iran have no problem in using 'Hajji', I don't think we should either. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:10, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a question on including it in the lead sentence, it's a question of whether to include it in the title - and titles should comply with WP guidelines. Is it a title or is it his name? That's the only issue, in my view. There's no reason to start a new precedent of including honorific titles when no other article on WP includes "Hajji." ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalenciaᐐT₳LKᐬ23:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Was about to say, I found a few with the name 'Hajji', such as Haj Ali Razmara, Haji Bektash Veli and Hajji Ebrahim Shirazi, but it's not really important whether zero or fifteen Wikipedia articles have a article starting with 'Hajji' in order to have the name of this article approved. As I said, 'Hajji' is more part of a name than a honorific title, in Persian at least. Take the Haji Alilu tribe, for example. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:10, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Hajji" was a common part of many Iranian names in the past. It was not just a "honorific" as in the classical sense.
"(...) I for one cannot find any examples of existing articles which contain "Hajji" as a title."