Talk:Hajduk

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Hajduk is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Balkan / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force

Montenegro

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Romania

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Serbia Mid‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I removed these hajduks added by User:151.205.9.162, since they fail the google test.

Milan Mileusnic (living legend)
Damir Arnautovic (living legend)
Vlado Brnecic (living legend)
Rajko Pupavac (living legend)
Vlado Magas (living legend)
Germano Nefat (living legend)
Damir Susanj (living legend)
Edo Demark (living legend)
Petar Popic (living legend)
Damir Matesevac (living legend)

bogdan | ^Talk 16:55, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Avram Iancu

How does he qualify as a haiduk? he was one of the leaders of an organised, national resistance movement with clear aims. He was a lawyer for God's sake! You might as easily say that George Washington was a haiduk since he too was a well educated commander of irregular troops, fighting against what he perceived were national opressors. Avram Iancu clearly does not qualify as a haiduk, i have heard this term describing only local guerrilas/bandits with a limited goal. Not a revolutionary leader! And also... I believe this article should not be linked to the WikiProjectSerbia since haiducs are part of the national myth of several other European countries. Serbia doesn't have a copyright on them. 89.35.62.12 (talk) 02:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hajduk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hajduk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060621010338/http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Stephenson:Neal:Quicksilver:391:Haiduks_(Professorbikeybike) to http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Stephenson:Neal:Quicksilver:391:Haiduks_(Professorbikeybike)

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Error in spelling

Hello,

Rewrite Hajduk to Haiduk.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/haiduk

Thank you Marino 08:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, my name is Losangelessloth and I also am here to propose and promote changing the erroneous spelling of the title of this Wikipedia Entry.

Specifically, from Hajduk to Haiduk.

I have here five (5) sources which all contain a singular, uniform spelling of this word. All five (5) sources choose to spell the title of this Wikipedia entry as: haiduk.

[1] There is the spelling from Dictionary.com already sourced by Marino around a year ago. ^[1].

[2] Secondly, there is the spelling from Merriam-Webster.com (apparently a company/publisher since 1823) ^[2].

[3] Thirdly, Britannica.com agrees with the previous two sources' spelling ^[3].

[4] Fourthly, I have a less renowned source which most likely obtains their content from more well established publishers, but, nevertheless, still displays the consistency/uniformity apparent across all other sources. The reference is from: Collins.com ^[4].

[5] Lastly, a similar source (in terms of lack of prestige) to [4] is thefreedictionary.com -- which follows the same characteristic pattern of spelling the word in question as: Haiduk ^[5].

Would anyone wish to discuss what more is necessary to push a change in the title of the Wikipedia entry?

I feel as though this collection of references should be quite sufficient, no?

If not, what more is required so that such a change can be made un-contested?

 Is it possible to change the title myself? I < 3 you.

Losangelessloth (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Contradiction

The opening sentence claims that hajdúk is the plural for hajdú. The first sentence of the fourth paragraph of the lede claims hajdúk is singular for hajduci. These two statements contradict one another. Please provide sources for these claims and edit as needed to resolve the contradiction. 2603:9001:4500:1C09:B195:F1C5:7920:6AD3 (talk) 23:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know what is the "hajduci" (as this is not Hungarian) but I know sure as native speaker this: simple Hungarian: "hajdú" (simple) and "hajdúk" (plural) OrionNimrod (talk) 08:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.dictionary.com/browse/haiduk

[2] ttps://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/haiduk

[3] ttps://www.britannica.com/topic/haiduk

[4] ttps://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/haiduk

[5] ttps://www.thefreedictionary.com/Haiduk

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]