Talk:Hairography/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Three issues:

Let's not use File:Lennon Ono Trudeau 1969 c.jpg; it has a personality rights warning, and I don't like leaving questioned images in good articles. All of Yoko's images here have that, I think.

How about moving File:Eve Whip It TIFF09.jpg up to Plot as its caption reads good for plot, and its more quickly visible. Then, in Production, you might consider a Whitney Houston image, and according to ref. 3, the internet buzz about the possibility of her appearing had been active.

In the lead and Production, it mentions "...a mash-up of Hair from the cast of Hair,.."; but since the cast is ever-changing, maybe something like "...from the musical..." would read better :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As ever, thank you for your review :) I've taken out the Yoko image - I remember seeing the warning template when I added it in, but I didn't actually know what it meant, and I think I just assumed that as it was used in the Yoko Ono article that it was okay, without bothering to research further, oops.

I tried moving the Eve image up to "Plot", but because of the length of the infobox for this one, it sat awkwardly beneath it and left a fair amount of whitespace. I changed it for a newer, clearer image, but it's also much larger and more obtrusive, and although there's a category for Whitney Houston on Commons, there don't seem to be any free images of her so "Production" is now image-less.

Something about the layout looks a little bit off to me now, but I don't know if it's just because I'm used to how it was before! The other alternative would be moving the old image of Eve back to "Production" and substituting the Jessalyn image with this one of Dianna: File:Dianna Agron 2009.jpg to preserve the R-L format. Or even keeping the new image of Eve where it is, putting File:Michael Hitchcock.jpg in "Production" and using the Dianna image in "Reception" to keep it R-L-R.

I'm probably over-thinking this, and it might well be fine as it is. I have changed 'by the cast of...' to 'from the musical...' as well, so that's sorted at least :) Chances are, the perfect image composition will occur to me as soon as I stop thinking about it, so I may well be back with an ETA soon. If you think it looks okay as it is now, I'm happy to stick with it though. Cheers! Frickative 10:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: I've added an infobox image and moved the new Eve image down a section. I think it looks a bit more... balanced? now, but yeah, I'm going to stop over-thinking it and leave the composition alone now! Frickative 10:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like what you have now :) Looks like another pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:52, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Hairography passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass