Talk:Hain Celestial Group

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not Organic

copy of email from the company:

Dear ------,

Thank you for taking the time to contact us regarding our Yves' Veggie Cuisine Veggie Burgers. We apologize for the delay in our reply and appreciate your patience. We strive to maintain the highest quality products and your satisfaction is very important to us.

These products include soy protein which is processed using hexane extraction. Testing ensures there is no residual hexane in this ingredient or in the final product.

Thank you for your continued support. If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact us at 1-800-434-4246, Monday through Friday from 7AM - 5PM Mountain Time.

Sincerely,

Julia Consumer Relations Representative

Ref # 2418873 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.165.246.30 (talk) 18:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership of company

Is Hain Celestial Group owned by a group of huge firms? One list floating around on facebook has it owned by seven huge firms, including Heinz which the article documents as having sold its stock ownership several years ago. The other firms in the fb post are Phillip Morris, Monsanto, Citigroup, Exxon-Mobil, Wal-Mart and Lockheed Martin. Is anyone able to document the truth of falsity of this, now in 2013?

Prairieplant (talk) 08:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From later research I see the firm is not owned by other firms and has its own place in the stock market. --Prairieplant (talk) 00:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding the article -- stop edit war

This article needs to get beyond Stub status. It never will when everything added is deleted, and nothing better is put in its place. Challenge to the personal care products in CA courts does not negate the company's existence. One editor asked for outside sources to validate the brands of food are organic, and then same editor reverts edit when a valid reference is found. The primary evidence of organic food status is the label on the product from the federal organic certification process, which is linked in text that was deleted once or twice, and in recognition by consumers that the products are truly organic, matching the certification. The CA court case section on personal care products is written. Move on to other aspects of the company, like how it is doing financially, how much revenue is personal care, how much is from food. It is publicly traded, so the stock analysis is important. Some publicly held company articles show the stock value as a changing part of the company box, and certainly discuss the revenues, costs, strengths, weaknesses of the company. That is what there is to say about a company. If you keep reverting what someone else writes, then have at it, and bias the article totally to your view. --Prairieplant (talk) 00:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is deleted for a reason: unsourced promotional claims. The company's existence is not being contested here. I don't know who's claiming that. If you wish to expand the article, then do so, but please stop adding promotional unverified stuff. If there is an official certification by a department of health, then perhaps we can add it, just that the food & drugs administration is questioned as the judge expressed it does not show interest in the subject. I'm sorry, but wikipedia does not accept blogs as valid sources. If I were to claim KFC is 100% organic on a private blog, does that mean it can be used here as a 'source'? No. Please see Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources. Calling something organic without proper citation is promoting it.

You also argued that a company wouldn't call itself organic if it was not certified. That is exactly why it is being sued. You must add some valid supporting citations, not blogs or the company's own claims.--Taeyebaar (talk) 03:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also I'm not concerned with the stocks or financial statements since those have already valid sources. I'm only concerned with adding promotional material without any valid citations as I already explained.--Taeyebaar (talk) 03:23, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hain Celestial Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120424200126/http://www.newmediacaucus.org/wp/organic-industry-structure/ to http://www.newmediacaucus.org/wp/organic-industry-structure/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]