Talk:Haimen, Nantong
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Haimen, Nantong article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Haimen, Nantong appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 August 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Sources for article expansion
[edit]This paper has an interesting series of maps showing the development of the estuarine islands in the Yangtze that eventually formed modern Haimen:
- Chen Jiyu & al. "The Model of Development of the Chang Jiang Estuary During the Last 2000 Years" in Estuarine Comparisons, p. 661. Academic Press (New York), 1982.
— LlywelynII 01:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Haimen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721165027/http://www.cpi.com.cn/cpi-eng/code/jiangsu.asp to http://www.cpi.com.cn/cpi-eng/code/jiangsu.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)