Talk:Hail to Pitt

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Pittsburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject University of PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject University of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

College football Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Untitled

Tagging this article for deletion goes against previous precedent as it is a fight song of a major American university. If you are going to add a deletion tag to this page due to non-notability, please add one equivalently to all the pages listed in the following two categories or don't add one at all:
Category:American college songs
Category:Fight songs
cp101p (talk) 03:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Panther Song

What is the source of the changes in current lyrics used in the Panther song? The song lyrics did match those printed in the Pitt News as cited. Is there a reasonable source for the changes made to the current lyrics?CrazyPaco (talk) 03:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

answered: see [[User talk:Tjtrumpet2323#Info on Pitt music CrazyPaco (talk) 22:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics

WP:NOTLYRICS does not prevent or forbid the inclusion of lyrics in this article.

To quote NOTLYRICS (bold mine for emphasis of my point):

For songs in the public domain the article should not consist solely of the lyrics (Wikisource should be used for such articles instead), but should instead provide information about authorship, date of publication, social impact, and so on. Quotations from an out-of-copyright song should be kept to a reasonable length relative to the rest of the article, and used to facilitate discussion, or to illustrate the style; the full text can be put on Wikisource and linked to from the article....See Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources for full discussion.

WP:NPS goes on to further state

If out of copyright, shorter texts - such as short speeches (the Gettysburg Address), short poems ("Ozymandias"), and short songs (most national anthems) - are usually included in their article.

For instance, The Star-Spangled Banner and O Canada includes full lyrics, while the cited examples of the hymn Christ the Lord Is Risen Today and poem Gunga Din do not.

Therefore, the lyrics have been restored to this article because: 1) The article "provide[s] information about authorship, date of publication, social impact, and so on". 2) The lyrics are used to "facilitate discussion, or to illustrate the style" such as the discussion as to their meaning, use, and origin (e.g. "alleghenee, genec, genac, genac" and "Uni") as well compared for changes over time. With their removal, the accompanying text of that discussion is rendered impotent. and 3) The lyrics are sufficiently short per examples of the national anthems. With that said, I do note the need to cull appearance of repetitiveness of the lyrics in modern vs traditional and perhaps add lyrics to Wikisource. CrazyPaco (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hail to Pitt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]