Talk:Hadith of the thaqalayn

Islam: Hadith Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hadith task force.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 17 January 2016, see discussion.
no consensus, 15 April 2014 (UTC), see discussion.

This hadith appears in Sahih Muslim and other canonical Sunni sources

I'll hopefully rewrite large parts of the article to better match the Wiki guidelines. Albertatiran (talk) 15:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Untitled)

The article has returned to a NPOV. Please stop defining the Sunni position via Shia websites.

http://www.imamreza.net/eng/imamreza.php?id=678&page=2 --Striver 16:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A lie

The following is a lie, the Ahlusunnah does not accept this version. The only one who did was Muhammad Nasirudeen Al-Albani.

Both Sunnis and Shi'as accept that Muhammad said the following:

"I m leaving among you something which is very important and should be followed, you will not go astray if you get hold of it after I am gone, one part of it being more important than the other: Allah's Book, which is a rope stretched from Heaven to Earth, and my close relatives, who belong to my household. These two will not separate from one another till they come down to the reservoir, so consider how you act regarding them after my departure." (Tirmidhi, Sahih Muslim) Both Sunnis and Shi'as believe in respecting Ahl al-Bayt. However, it is only the Shi'as who claim that the Caliph (leader) of the Muslims must always be a descendant of Muhammad. Sunnis reject that it can only be Imam Ali, in whose household Muhammad was raised, whom Muhammad has chosen through the divine revelation to be the caliph of Muslim Ummah.

87.51.211.84 15:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please bring some references for your allegation?

--85.183.206.130 (talk) 00:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view and consistency

In the interests of neutrality, I have changed language of "accept" to "believe" and similar edits.
I have removed this sentence: "The Shi'as believe that Muhammad said this hadith so many times because he wanted to stress how important it was that the Muslims only take his own descendants as leaders" because, especially in the absence of a citation, it is inappropriate for the article's authors to present their interpretations as authoritative or representative.
I have changed "the Shi'as" to "Shi'as" throughout because of an inconsistency between how "Shia Muslims" in plural were being referred to.
I have deleted the sentence "It is these latter versions that more strongly support the Shi'a interpretation that Muhammad intended to keep the leadership of the Muslims within his own family" because it is in total disregard of the Neutral Point of View policy. The purpose of the article is not to interpret the hadith, but to objectively describe its text, its history, and its social importance. The article should not be seen as an opportunity to provide an authoritative sectarian interpretation of the hadith.76.119.208.81 (talk) 22:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cooperation to improve the article

@HyperGaruda, MezzoMezzo, Mhhossein, Toddy1, Human10.0, FreeatlastChitchat, and Nannadeem: Following our successful cooperation in Ali and Taqiya and invite you discuss about this article. Unfortunately, it has POV since 2010. In addition, it contains Original Research based on Hadith collections.--Seyyed(t-c) 09:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Seyyed, I found some useful sources; [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Mhhossein (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source 1 and 2 are merely passing mentions. 3, 4 and 5 seem OK. 6 and 7 will be difficult to use in rewriting the article, since only a short snippet view is available, unless of course you have access to the entire book. 8 might be useful as extra information, but it does not give the basic stuff we need for rewriting. - HyperGaruda (talk) 20:00, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hadith of the two weighty things. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100526063938/http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/muslim/031.smt.html to http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/Muslim/hadith/Muslim/031.smt.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interpretation

The Interpretation part is full of long quotation referenced with Primary sources. So I remove this section and try to replace the relevant material.Saff V. (talk) 10:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the sunni version of replacing ahl-bayt with sunnah is not proper

[9]

Dr Adnan ibrahim claims that the replacing "ahl-bayt" with "sunnah" in the hadith is a corruption instigated by the umayyid dynasty in order to villify the status of the household of the prophet.

In order to justify his claim, Dr Adnan ibrahim says that the corruption is not in any of the 6 sahih hadith books,

[10] [11] [12] [13]

i propose that this critical piece of information be incorporated into the text.

The original wiki entry links to some sources that aren't either accessible or do not contain the actual text. Mhveinvp (talk) 08:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]