Talk:Hadith collection

This article is ill-conceived and I'm not sure it can be rescued. Striver left out a whole branch of Islam, the Ibadis. They aren't numerous, but they shouldn't be left out. Also, I don't think that there's any end to the list. Any scholar can make a list of hadith he (it's always he, dang it) regards as reliable. Some scholars have been more influential than others, and some collections have achieved semi-canonical status in some traditions, But well-known shades only gradually into completely obscure. Where do we draw the line?

Striver seems to have set up a template too. Without consulting anyone. Zora 01:30, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus, you do love to complain. Well, creat a Ibadi section, how hard is that? You dont know anything about them? Then i guess they wheren all that noteworthy. You *do* know? Then add it. They are noteworthy, but you dont have any info? Then google it. But pleeeeeaase stop complaining! No end to the list? Like in List of people who have disappeared? We trim it if it gets to longs, notability is not always obvious, see List of people from California.--Striver 07:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and about the template, is it to Shi'a centric? --Striver 07:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim view

Sunnis consider the door of ijtihad to have been sealed? Where is the source of this claim and how can this claim be made when ijtihad and qiyas are one of the sources of Sunni jurisprudence? This section is heavily biased and is not NPOV. It should be edited, or otherwise deleted. Aslamt 03:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Importance of this page?

I suggest that this page be merged with the hadith article and what little unique information present be cut and pasted into the appropriate place. This article is also very similar to the history of hadith article which I also suggested be merged with the hadith article.Supertouch (talk) 02:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]