Talk:HR 8799 d
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
I read the preprint Stability of the directly imaged multiplanet system HR 8799: resonance and masses and says that the planet is eccentric with e>0.04, but probably that should be e>0.4, because e=0.04 is not eccentric while e=0.4 is. So I've added eccentricity of HR 8799 d as 0.4 to this article as I created it and HR 8799, but the anonymous user 76.106.45.93 change it to 0.04 in the infobox of this article and HR 8799 in planetary system section. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 02:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- When the paper you cite says 0.04, it means 0.04. 0.4 is not correct. Spacepotato (talk) 08:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
e is also known (but not directly imaged and discovered later). The lead should no longer say that d is the innermost. -- J. Wong (talk) 20:14, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HR 8799 d. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131126160805/http://www.keckobservatory.org/article.php?id=231 to http://www.keckobservatory.org/article.php?id=231
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)