Talk:HMS Unicorn (I72)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MisterBee1966 (talk · contribs) 09:15, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Please find attached my comments and excuse my ignorance MisterBee1966 (talk) 09:17, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe link first occurrence of Royal Navy, Far East Fleet
- Done.
Do you have any interesting info on who christened her or notable people who served on Unicorn?
- Unfortunately, no.
"The fighter shortage grew so acute during the operation that fighters from the carriers Illustrious and Illustrious" doesn't make sense to me should this be two different ships? We have an article HMS Illustrious (87) is the link broken?
- Should have been Formidable. Fixed.
I believe that you use the abbreviation RNAS without introducing it
- Done.
you need to fix two disambiguations: Devonport and Sasebo
- Done.
Not every book is used in your citations. May be move the unused books to a section "further reading"?
- Deleted the unused book. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:53, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]