Talk:HMS Tribune (1918)

HMS Tribune (1918) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 2, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Tribune (1918)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will get to this one shortly. Zawed (talk) 10:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the delay in coming back to this, comments as follows:

Design and development

one of thirty-three Admiralty S class destroyers...: is the Admiralty supposed to be there? In the lead only S class is used.

Removed.

The converted p.p length doesn't quite match what is in the infobox, ditto the speed figures

Made consistent.

Should shp be linked/converted in the infobox?

Linked and converted.

The sentence that starts The ship was designed to mount two 18-inch... is quite long with a lot of commas. It could be broken up.

Split in two.

Construction and career

On 21 September 1923, Tribune was recommissioned...: there is no mention of being decommissioned?

Amended.

Other stuff

Image tags OK
dupe links: long tons

That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 09:40, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zawed: Thank you for this review. I believe I have completed the changes. simongraham (talk) 02:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the changes look fine. I am going to pass this as GA as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]