Talk:HMS Tabard (P342)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: User:Canpark 10:17, 3 August 2011

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   An excellent use of a combination of print and online sources.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The historical information of the submarine are well covered, very interesting.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   There are no edit wars.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Because I knew absolutely nothing about this topic, I appreciate the detailed information of the HMS Tabard provided in the article. The editor used a simple lay out in line with MoS guidelines, which made it easy to read. I will pass this article.