Talk:HMS St Michael (1669)

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Early Modern Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Do the 1669 and 1732 ships deserve separate articles? How much did they differ from each other? Drutt (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, one day, but the WP:SHIPS guidelines are that if the article is shorter than the infobox (and right now it is significantly so) then it should remain as one article, with the other incarnations of that ship being redirects to the main article. It's probably unlikely that there will be a vast amount to say about either phase of the ship's existence so one article is really all that's needed. Martocticvs (talk) 21:47, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]