Talk:HMS Ruby (1652)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / French / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Wouldn't 40 guns place her in the Fifth rate frigate category? TaintedMustard (talk) 22:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, only by later standards. The first frigates built for the navy between the mid and late 1640s carried between 32 and 38 guns and were classified as fourth rates. The frigates constructed from the early 1650s were divided into two rough groups, third rates that carried between 48 and 52 guns, and fourth rates that carried between 38 and 46 guns. Most of the fourth rates were around 40 and 44 guns. Only in the later part of the seventeenth century does the rating system come to resemble that of the later period of naval warfare. Benea (talk) 03:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Thanks for clearing that up for me. Perhaps that should be part of the Fourth-rate article? The wording in this article is confusing, initially using "Fourth rate" as a classification of frigate and then as a term for a ship of the line, without explaining the change in terminology in between. TaintedMustard (talk) 08:35, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Ruby (1652). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091116050203/http://www.netmarine.net/bat/smarins/rubis/anciens.htm to http://www.netmarine.net/bat/smarins/rubis/anciens.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]