Talk:HMS Revenge (1892)

HMS Revenge (1892) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

HMS Revenge (1892) is part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 6, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
August 23, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 17, 2016.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 1915, the HMS Revenge, the ninth ship of the Royal Navy with that name, became the first ship to be fitted operationally with anti-torpedo bulges?

Current status: Good article

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Revenge (1892)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 09:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

With a few minor grammatical tweaks made, the article complies with policies on grammar as well as general layout/structure. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article uses a sizable wealth of reliable sources. No signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article definitely seems to cover all relevant information for which reliable sources could provide. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article maintains an unbiased approach to its subject. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since at least August 2012, the article has not been subjected to edit warring or similar disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 02:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

The images used in this article all serve relevant illustrative purposes, and all have suitable captions. Also, there is no risk of fair use violation due to their public domain status. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

@Wilhelmina Will:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelmina Will, despite taking this review over a month ago, nothing substantial has occurred. Will you be able to continue it? I'm pinging Sturmvogel 66 on this as well. Display name 99 (talk) 15:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry; my family and I have been preoccupied with trying to raise our new puppies for over a month now, and even my Wikipedian priorities have suffered a toll from it. I'll get on to this review right now. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize again for the long wait, but I do hope it will be considered worth it, for this article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations!!! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]