Talk:HMS Resolution (1892)

HMS Resolution (1892) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

HMS Resolution (1892) is part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 8, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
August 23, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Resolution (1892)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I'll take this one. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 21:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 21:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1A="Resolution was built by Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company,[1] at a cost of £875,522, plus £78,295 for guns." Perhaps this should be made clear in the info box as well?

Done

1B=You might want to add the British English tag to the talk page to notify editors; not required, just a thought.

Done

…"was recommissioned into the Special Service Division…" The SSD stands as a redlink, is it necessary, or perhaps could it be linked to an existing article? This link reappears later as well.

I reckon it should be left—a lot of ship articles like this include red-links

"...near the Tongue Lightship on 15 July 1906." The Tongue Lightship is redlinked, same questions asked for it.

So, looking at Lightvessels in the United Kingdom, I think this was probably based on Tongue Sands in the Thames Estuary, but the source does not elaborate on this. I reckon it's best left red-linked, so that if someone does create articles on lightvessels, then it will link appropriately.

1 com= A few minor issues and questions here
2A= Excellent here
2B= Here as well
2C= "...in combined manoeuvres in 1906…" Where exactly, and in what context? Any info?

For the reasons given in the Tounge Lightship query above, I am not sure I should elaborate on this more. The sources don't give any more information.

2com= Just one question
3A= Certainly does so
3B="In the view of R. A. Burt…" Whom is that?

Elaborated that he's a maritime historian; he wrote quite a few books on Royal Navy topics, but doesn't have an article

"...Resolution was sold as scrap for £35,650 to F. Rijsdijk…" And who is that?

The sources don't elaborate on who he is. In my opinion, he is likely Frank Rijsdijk, "director of ship recycling", but I have no reliable sources to support that assumption.

3com= Two unknown names here
4= Yes
4com= ✓ Pass
5= Pass
5com=✓ Pass
6A= Great
6B= Super
6com=✓ Pass

Excellent job on this article! One in a long line. Just a few minor obstacles to pass through before this one is passed. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 21:30, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will get on this today. Thank you, --Noswall59 (talk) 09:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

@QatarStarsLeague: Hi, I believe I have addressed all actionable comments through this edit. If there is anything else, don't hesitate to let me know. Thank you for carrying out the review, —Noswall59 (talk) 11:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Nice work attending to the issues I raised, and again nice work on the article. This one passes. Done QatarStarsLeague (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drowning in 1901

My grandmothers brother William Pridgeon died at Berenhaven when the ships pinnacle (jolly boat) was hit by a violet squall and capsized, he was a 16 year old boy and one of many not recovered from the sea 31.51.171.137 (talk) 21:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]