Talk:HMS Racoon (1782)

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Move?

If the ship was commissioned in 1782, shouldn't it be moved to HMS Racoon (1782)? (Courtesy pinging page creator User:Euryalus) The Average Wikipedian (talk) 14:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Average Wikipedian: You're right, my error for not spotting that myself. The date confusion arises from a passing mention in Colledge's Ships of the Royal Navy where he confirms the commissioning date as August 1782 but also adds the cryptic phrase "Dates from 1780." The other standard reference (Winfield) just lists 1782, and places it in the context of the 41 other North American purchases of the same time, none of which were retained without commission for more than a few months. There would be no reason for the Navy to buy a small merchant brig and leave her uncommissioned for two years at the height of the American Revolutionary War.

I suspect (but can't prove) that Colledge's reference to 1780 is the date the merchant brig Lovely Sally was launched. Either way, in the absence of a launch date (for a purchased vessel with very few recorded specifications) the referenced commissioning date seems appropriate for naming the article. -- Euryalus (talk) 14:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]