Jump to content

Talk:HMS Neptune (1797)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk contribs count) 14:35, 9 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]


Nicely done, but some presentation issues need to be resolved.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    No bullets in infobox as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines. Not required, but add publisher location and fix capitalization in Lavery's subtitle.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Consolidate refs, forex cites 2 and 3 at the end of the Mutiny at the Nore section will suffice for the entire paragraph.
    I despise your citation style, but it's not incorrect.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: