This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
HMS Mallow (K81) is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Per WP:SHIPSNOTCREWS I removed all the mentions of non notable Captains from the article together with the notification of a minor award to one of them. To me it seems a prime example of why we have the guideline "as a general principle only individuals who are independently notable or were significant to the ship's history (i.e. playing a substantial role in a major event involving the ship)" - none of these are independently notable nor played a substantial role in any major event to my mind. I feel its just fluff and pointless namechecking to include them which is of no interest to the general reader. Anyhow I've been reverted and invited to discuss here, so opinions? Lyndaship (talk) 13:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For starters, in your determination to remove all mention of the captains (no other crew are mentioned), you also removed the mention of the fact that the ship itself was no longer listed as active on the Navy List at the point when it was going to be transferred to the Yugoslavs. That is surely relevant. Secondly, WP:SHIPSNOTCREWS is a project guideline, and there is no policy requiring it to be complied with in a blanket manner. The folly of the blanket application of this guideline is demonstrated in the case of Noall in particular, who while he isn't likely be notable, was the captain of the ship when it was involved in the sinking of a sub, and he was awarded the DSO for his distinguished service engaging submarines in that and other actions as captain of this ship. How on earth is this "fluff"? If the sub sinking and Noall's captaincy during it, for which he received a significant award is not a "major event" involving this ship, what on earth would qualify in your opinion? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:45, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. Piggott (not Brown) ended up with DSC and Bar, OBE, was skipper of HMS Fleetwood when it co-sank two uboats, and made captain post-war. Clouston definitely not, only made lieutenant commander, commanded a frigate and was MiD. He can almost certainly go. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can appreciate that would be a reason for adding Piggott to the Fleetwood article but I think it's a bit too tangential for mentioning on a ship article which he previously commanded Lyndaship (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.svg)
