Talk:HMS Intrepid (1747)
Appearance
HMS Intrepid (1747) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 16, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Intrepid (1747) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessing
[edit]Looks B class to me. Let me know if you would like it assessing. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Intrepid (1747)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 21:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
I will review this article. Djmaschek (talk) 21:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Other comments
[edit]Please fix these issues. Djmaschek (talk) 04:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- In the infobox, Captured & Acquired give a date of 3 May 1747, but the text gives the correct date of 14 May 1747. Use the correct date.
- Corrected, but added a note to explain the discrepancy. Harrias talk 08:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Tonnage is listed as 1,019 bm in the cited text, but it is 1,286 bm in the infobox.
- Corrected to 1,286. Harrias talk 08:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ordered (6 February 1738) is listed in the infobox, but not in the text. It should be listed and cited in the text or cited in the infobox.
- Added into the text. Harrias talk 08:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Draught (6.50 / 6.74 m) is listed in the infobox, but not in the text. It should be listed and cited in the text or cited in the infobox.
- Added into the text. Harrias talk 08:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Design and description, paragraph 2, sentence 4: "twenty-six 24-pounders on the lower gun deck, twenty-eight 12-pounders on the upper gun deck". Add links to 24-pounder long gun and 12-pounder long gun. Sadly, there is no link for the 6-pounder naval gun of the 1700s.
- Added links. Harrias talk 08:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Royal Navy, paragraph 3, sentence 2: "and sailed with Hawke's fleet". I believe it needs a link for Hawke.
- Added a link. Harrias talk 08:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Royal Navy, paragraph 3, sentence 8: "Towards the end of the battle". I believe it should be "Toward".
- ENGVAR thing; US English prefers "Toward", BrEng prefers "Towards". Harrias talk 08:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Got me on that one. Djmaschek (talk) 19:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- ENGVAR thing; US English prefers "Toward", BrEng prefers "Towards". Harrias talk 08:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Pictures
[edit]- The infobox picture needs a PD-US or PD-US-expired tag. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Copyright_tags. Djmaschek (talk) 00:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- I hate Commons licensing. Should be sorted now. Harrias talk 09:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- I also find it murky. Djmaschek (talk) 19:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- I hate Commons licensing. Should be sorted now. Harrias talk 09:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Djmaschek: Cheers for the review, I have responded to each of your comments above. Harrias talk 09:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Pass. Djmaschek (talk) 19:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- GA-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages