Jump to content

Talk:HMS Hereward (H93)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 13:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Is "refuelled" Brit-English? (as opposed to "refueled")
    You know, I don't know? My unconscious habit is to always double the terminal "1" when putting the word in past tense. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I only noticed it because I checked for typos in the editing window - Firefox underlined it and suggested it should be one "l". Parsecboy (talk) 18:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    There are a few dabs that should be hidden (Valiant and Orion, maybe the title for John Buchan, forex)
    Done.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just a couple of little things to check. Parsecboy (talk) 13:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]