Talk:HMS Hercules (1910)

HMS Hercules (1910) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 9, 2017. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Hercules (1910) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Added some historical detail Fenton Robb 10:58, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think this page should be formatted in the RN template. I am too new to take this on yet, but if someone else did, I could have a go at filling in some more details. Fenton Robb 13:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Operation ZZ

At High Seas Fleet the count of German ships is reported as 11 battleships, 5 battlecruisers, 8 cruisers and 48t destroyers, however the numbers in Beatty's orders of 20th are 9 battleships, 5 battle cruiser, 7 light cruisers and 50 destroyers (Memorandum H.F. 0050/9, issued on 20 November 1918, by Admiral Sir David Beatty)] Hearsay evidence - two German destroyers failed to leave port.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Hercules (1910)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 06:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in pretty good shape.

The displacement in the text and infobox doesn't match.
probably worth specifying that the secondary guns were in single mounts
After introducing BS as an abbreviation, suggest referring to 1st BS.
suggest linking mobilisation
- Excellent idea!
link Home Fleet at first mention
- Linked in the lede
link dreadnought at 16 dreadnoughts
- Isn't this covered in the link for dreadnought battleships in the lede? Or is this just different enough?
the sentence beginning During this foray appears to be out of sequence
- Moved earlier in the para, but I kinda think that it breaks the flow up a bit, what do you think?
  - I think it flows ok.
Agincourt should probably be linked
- Good catch.
she was sold
images are all appropriately licensed and captioned.

That's me done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you looking this over. Let me know what you think of my changes.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- No prob. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, and is illustrated by appropriately license images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HE shell use at Jutland ?

"One of her high-explosive (HE) shells penetrated through the upper superstructure and caused minor splinter damage. The second HE shell burst on hitting the upper hull armour,.." ? She would have been firing armour-piercing, not HE at naval targets ? Rcbutcher (talk) 06:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]