Talk:HMS Greyhound (H05)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Greyhound (H05) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
HMS Greyhound (H05) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 23, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the British destroyer HMS Greyhound initiated the night phase of the Battle of Cape Matapan on 28/29 March 1941 when her searchlight illuminated an Italian cruiser? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Greyhound (H05)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 17:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose: (MoS):
- prose: (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
-
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]1. Exclusive of government-furnished equipment. Suggest - Excluding government-furnished equipment
- As always.
2. Aside from a brief period assigned to the 20th Destroyer Flotilla. Suggest - Aside from a brief period were she was assigned to the 20th Destroyer Flotilla
- Good idea.
3. withdrawal of the three survivors later that day. Are those the British destroyers that survived?
- Reworded.
4. 28/29 March. Suggest - 28-29 March
- Nope, this is the proper usage according to the MOS for the night of.
5. Stukas. Suggest - A link, or German Junkers Ju 87 dive bombers
- Did the same thing as for the other article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 17:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Nice work Strum. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class Shipwreck articles
- Low-importance Shipwreck articles
- GA-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles