Jump to content

Talk:HMS Grenville (H03)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHMS Grenville (H03) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 25, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Grenville (H03)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bernstein2291 (Talk Contributions Sign Here) 20:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Can you find any more sources about this ship?
    Sure, but they don't have as much detail as the ones used.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    So you would get no new information by using those other sources? Bernstein2291 (Talk Contributions Sign Here) 17:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly. She had such a short life that there's not much coverage on her, unlike her sisters.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Are there any photos or diagram of the ship?
    Not for her, but I added one for her sister.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Not even a diagram? Bernstein2291 (Talk Contributions Sign Here) 17:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Nothing that's not copyrighted.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I've added another source.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked for a second opinion. While on paper it should pass, my gut is telling me different. Bernstein2291 (Talk Contributions Sign Here) 05:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to pass it. Bernstein2291 (Talk Contributions Sign Here) 02:19, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]