Talk:HMS Gladiator
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Gladiator article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]OK I'm not going to argue over this but if this is a dab page (as it suggests it is) it should be governed by MOS:DAB because this is not an article. If however it is a list then it is not. Could the category be changed to reflect this I wonder? Abtract (talk) 02:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Shipdab was set up as an alternative to general dab pages, combining features of a dab page with that of a list. This is why it has the specific template, and does not carry the general dab one. I don't recall this being a categorisation problem before, and there are thousands of such pages. But this is a case where common sense has ruled out the general application of MOS:DAB requirements, and specific guidelines have duly been written especially for these pages. If you hadn't come across them before then you weren't to know. Benea (talk) 03:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- List-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- SIA-Class military history articles
- SIA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- SIA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- SIA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- List-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles