Jump to content

Talk:HMS Daring (H16)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 17:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article shortly. Miyagawa (talk) 17:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • No dab issues.
  • All external links functioning.
  • Description: Was this the standard setup for a D class destroyer? Obviously you don't need to go into great detail and compare everything, but if there was any specific changes then that should be mentioned.
    • Yeah, this was the standard configuration for the class, although half had the 2x 2-pdrs and half had 2x quad .50-calibre MGs.
  • Career: I moved a reference to the next punctuation mark after HMS Wishart as it looked a bit lost in the middle of a sentence.
    • OK
  • Career: Although I agree that Otto Kretschmer is legendary, technically it's non neutral. Can you replace with something else?

Other than that, I think it's all good to go. Miyagawa (talk) 17:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Suitable references in place.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Following that amendment, the article is now neutral in tone.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    All stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Image has appropriate licence.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    All in all a good job. Miyagawa (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]