Jump to content

Talk:HMS Centurion (1892)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHMS Centurion (1892) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHMS Centurion (1892) is part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 11, 2018Good article nomineeListed
August 23, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Centurion (1892)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 09:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This article is in good shape, my comments on the class article having already been addressed here. A couple of minor observations:

  • ihp in body, shp in infobox? Are they equivalent?
  • "barbette hoods as the" should this be "and" rather than "as"?
  • link Cyprian Bridge
  • authorlink Norman Friedman in Refs
  • If File:HMSCenturion1892.jpg is Crown copyright expired, it doesn't need the US license
  • if you want to move the cigarette card image up alongside the infobox you can use {{stack|float=right|}}, see Josip Broz Tito for an example.

Otherwise, good to go. Nice one. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]