Talk:HMS Cardiff (D58)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 09:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will take this one, comments to follow over the weekend. Zawed (talk) 09:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, took me longer than I thought to get to this. That said, there is little to fault here. I made one edit to correct a minor issue, the other other things I picked up are:

wikilink Bolshevik and Second Battle of Heligoland Bight in the body of the article, they are both linked in the lead.
- I honestly don't see any need to link any terms already linked in the lede unless it's a much longer article than this one.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise, the article reads well, is fully cited, and provides broad coverage of the subject. It uses neutral language and is stable. There are appropriate tags on the images. No duplicate or dab links, external links check out OK. Zawed (talk) 09:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sturmvogel 66: Hmm, I've only just noticed that very few of the linked terms in the lede are linked in the article body. There I was thinking I had looked at this closely...Anyhow, I am happy to pass as a GA in light of the reasoning you have provided for the linking issue. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 08:36, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]