Talk:HMS Belvidera (1809)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Slavery

In the "Post-war" section of this article, it states that the Belvidera "was reported to be at Puerto Rico, where she was attempting to recover either escaped slaves, or slaves that had been improperly sold." This strikes me as somewhat implausible, particularly given the lack of a citation at the sentence; by 17 May 1835, when the reported sighting occurred, slavery had been abolished in the British West Indies (via the Slavery Abolition Act 1833), so a government frigate retrieving slaves for the purpose of returning them to enslavement seems highly unlikely. If no one else objects to it, I will remove the sentence in question. Dabberoni15 (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dabberoni15, good point. When I can get back to my sources I will see if I can find a better explanation and source. Acad Ronin (talk) 16:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]