Talk:HMS Basilisk (H11)
HMS Basilisk (H11) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 10, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the British destroyer HMS Basilisk evacuated a total of 695 men on 31 May 1940 from Dunkirk before she was sunk by German aircraft the next day? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright problem removed
[edit]Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-15B-Basilisk.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
B review
[edit]All it needs is an inline ref for the lead-in paragraph. LanceBarber (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lead sections don't require citations if the material is covered in the body of the article. Parsecboy (talk) 19:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Recent edits
[edit]@Sturmvogel 66: What's wrong with auto ed? Keith-264 (talk) 09:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- You deleted the link for John Brown as well as making a cosmetic edit.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Auto eds aren't cosmetic. Keith-264 (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- [1] This one certainly was.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- John Brown is a duplicate link. Keith-264 (talk) 21:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Quite right, my apologies.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Auto eds aren't cosmetic. Keith-264 (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Oh, yes, that one was. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles