Talk:HMS Barham (04)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this one. JAGUAR 17:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

"Other than that battle, and the inconclusive Action of 19 August" - why is this not written fully as Action of 19 August 1916?
"Barham was played a minor role in quelling" - removed 'was'
"At 18:17 he realized that" - realised, if you want to stay consistent with British spelling
"before she stabilized without any damage." - stabilised too
"Lützow was little bothered by these hits" - I don't understand this. Not sure if it sounds too informal here - does this mean she suffered little damage?
"Von Tiesenhausen was not certain of the results of his attack and radioed that he'd hit a Queen Elizabeth-class battleship with one torpedo" - he had
No dead links

This is a great article. Well written, comprehensive and very deserving of GA status. Once all of the above are clarified this should be good to go. JAGUAR 17:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching these; this is exactly the kind of stuff I was looking for my reviewer to find.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for addressing them! I'll promote this. I might review a few more soon.

JAGUAR 13:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]