Talk:HMS Aurora (1887)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 08:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

• "Aurora participate in Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee Fleet review" -participated.
  • Good catch.
• What is the source for all that infobox data?
  • Everything in the infobox is sourced in the main body. Or at least it's supposed to be; if not let me know.

Very little to pick on, a very sound entry Sturmvogel 66♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks for reviewing this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Sound job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)